Nautica and Brooks Brothers are being sued for taking advantage of the circumstances after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel to illegally terminate their licensing agreement covering Israel and the Palestinian Territories.
A copy of the complaint and exhibits can be downloaded here.
In a civil complaint filed on September 18, 2024 by Royal Linen Ltd. and Royal Linen Capital (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs” or “Licensees”) against Nautica Apparel, Inc., ABG International, Inc., and BB IPCO, LLC (collectively referred to as “Defendants” or “Licensors”). The Plaintiffs allege that the Defendants improperly attempted to terminate licensing agreements granting the Plaintiffs exclusive rights to market Nautica and Brooks Brothers products in Israel and the Palestinian territories. The Plaintiffs seek declaratory judgments affirming the validity of the licensing agreements, as well as monetary damages for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, tortious interference, fraud, fraudulent inducement, and business defamation. The Plaintiffs claim they have suffered damages exceeding $13 million due to the Defendants’ actions.
Defendants are accused of acting in bad faith, especially during the Israel-Gaza conflict, which caused business disruptions and limited Plaintiffs’ ability to meet certain contractual obligations. Plaintiffs argue that Defendants used this situation as a pretext to terminate the agreements.
The complaint outlines several facts suggesting that the defendants allegedly exploited the Hamas attacks on Israel to create a pretext for terminating the agreements:
Employee Military Service: After the attacks, many of Plaintiffs’ employees, including their Chief Financial Officer, were drafted for military service. Defendants were aware of this disruption but allegedly continued demanding immediate compliance with financial and operational obligations.
Interrupted Business Operations: Plaintiffs were in the process of constructing a new Nautica store, which stalled due to workforce shortages as employees were mobilized for military duty. Despite these extraordinary circumstances, Defendants proceeded with breach notices and termination letters.
False Assurance to Suspend Collections: Defendants reportedly assured Plaintiffs they would halt collection efforts due to the uncertain conditions but later continued these efforts, issuing delinquency notices despite prior promises to pause collections.
Timing of Termination Notices: Defendants issued the Notices of Breach and Termination shortly after the attacks, allegedly using the conflict’s disruption to claim breaches by Plaintiffs that were beyond their control due to the war. Plaintiffs contend that Defendants had already been creating barriers to compliance but used the conflict as an excuse for termination
Unjust Enrichment and Fraud: Defendants allegedly retained substantial prepayments from Plaintiffs while simultaneously obstructing Plaintiffs’ contract performance and negotiating with other parties, amounting to unjust enrichment and fraudulent conduct.
Defendants have not yet responded to the allegations, but must do so by October 31, 2024, according to a docket entry.
Please keep us updated if and when the defendabts respond. What happens if they don’t respond by October 31?
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.
Thank you for your post, and i suppose it helps me a lot.
I’ve been surfing on-line greater than three hours today, but I never found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It?¦s lovely price sufficient for me. In my opinion, if all webmasters and bloggers made good content material as you did, the internet might be much more useful than ever before.
The narrow focus immediately vetted potential candidates, and by establishing a basis, the Castellanos did not should personally subject requests for money and contributions.
Your words have a way of resonating deeply with your readers Thank you for always being encouraging and uplifting
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
Hello just wanted to give you a brief heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different web browsers and both show the same outcome.
Hi there, I believe your website could be having web browser compatibility problems. When I take a look at your website in Safari, it looks fine however, when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping issues. I merely wanted to provide you with a quick heads up! Other than that, great website.
Thank you, I’ve recently been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered so far. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure about the source?
I really like your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did youdesign this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it foryou? Plz respond as I’m looking to design my own blog and would like toknow where u got this from. thanks a lot
I every time used to read piece of writing in news papers but now as I am a userof web thus from now I am using net for posts, thanks to web.
We have located sizeable proof of racial bias among the police and court docket staff in Ferguson. Theconfluence of policing to raise earnings and racialbias as a result has resulted in techniques thatnot only violate the Constitution and induce immediate damage to theindividuals whose rights are violated, but also undermine group trust, particularlyamong several African Americans. The male objected, citing his constitutional legal rights.The 2nd was regarding a clause in the will of Francis Jackson ofBoston, who left $5,000 and other house to the woman’s rights result in.When the gals show that they want to vote, Iam inclined to give them all the rights they want.This exhibit did for cop exhibits what “Get Smart” did for spy reveals.There is nevertheless a lot of function to be finished to get this to give regularly great success,but I assume it really is at the phase the place it could bevaluable to people, which is why I produced it.As of December 2014, more than 7 years later on, irrespective of originally owing a $151 fantastic and getting previously paid out $550, shenonetheless owed $541.